Expanded scope roles in primary health – what makes them work?  — YRD
  1. Schedule
  2. Poster Display
  3. Expanded scope roles in primary health – what makes them work? 

Expanded scope roles in primary health – what makes them work?  (448)

David Lim 1 , Leo McNamara 2 , Sonya Osborne 3 , Vivienne Tippett 2
  1. Queensland University of Technology, Spring Hill, QLD, Australia
  2. School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
  3. School of Nursing , Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
Introduction

The demand for better integration between primary and secondary healthcare frequently leads to discussion about expanded scope of practice for nursing, paramedic and allied health professionals and the role these clinicians could play in facilitating improved access to timely and appropriate healthcare.  From workforce perspective, expanded scope of practice has also been advocated as a mean of fostering workforce retention.  Models of expanded scope roles in nursing and paramedicine have been trialled nationally and internationally in both acute and community care settings.  Where they have been successful, trials have resulted in reduction in hospital presentation and admission; improved patient access and timeliness; and patient satisfaction.  This paper will examine the characteristics of successful expanded scope programs.

Method

Exploratory case-study analysis of successful integration of expanded health care roles across primary healthcare settings in rural Australia.  

Results & Conclusions

One size does not fill all.  Successful models of integrated expanded health care roles in primary health care settings are built on stakeholder’s capacity and preference; community need; and political will.  Collaborative, congruent, multi-disciplinary care teams that prioritise patient-centred care within a dynamic primary care setting have merit and are more likely to foster flexibility and sustainability.